<wimt> Well as far as alt nicks go, can't see it matters.
<wimt> You can't force people to group a nick if they don't want to.
<Ttech> We have been telling users to do it?
<Ttech> Shouldn't opers do the same?
<Ttech> Or should we be more lenient?
<wimt> I haven't been telling users they have to
>xmE< eeew!!! Don't do that again!
* Received a CTCP FINGER from xmE
* Received a CTCP BUT I WANT TOO from xmE
<wimt> If someone is using multiple vhosts to evade bans, it would be fair play to strip them of those vhosts. But telling them they *have* to group all their nicks at once is unnecessary and unenforceable.
<charlie> i haven't been telling users to do that
<charlie> in fact, i've never heard of any plan to force that ttech, i remember a guide on the wiki to do it
<wimt> If they aren't abusing them, there's really no issue.
<Ttech> charlie, hmm...
<Ttech> alright
<Ttech> I just also see that if we have 20 different DevNode.staff
<Ttech> nicks
<Ttech> for one or two staff members
<Ttech> it can kina get confusing for users
<charlie> yeah, i think CodeBlock-laptop should make his vhost codeblock.devnode.staff instead of making a new one
>xmE< eeew!!! Don't do that again!
* Received a CTCP FINGER from xmE
<CodeBlock-laptop> ..
<CodeBlock-laptop> charlie: its fine....
<CodeBlock-laptop> ><
<charlie> i.e. group them, if that'll make them share hosts
<CodeBlock-laptop> hint: its not big deal
<CodeBlock-laptop> let it go
<Ttech> Opers should have similar so it doesn ot consue them
<CodeBlock-laptop> ><
<charlie> CodeBlock-laptop: let me just ask you, do you find your ignorance charming, or what?
<Ttech> opers should have really sim ilar hostmasks by nicks so users don't get confused
<CodeBlock-laptop> ...
<Ttech> wimt, you say?
* CodeBlock-laptop puts ttech back on ignore, and charlie ON ignore.
<wimt> I'd suggest staff ones are probably most sensible making it very obvious which staffer it
* Received a CTCP CTCP conversations are fun from scott
<wimt> *it is
<CodeBlock-laptop> wimt: people know cb = codeblock
<Ttech> wimt, so yes no?
<wimt> Both for other vhosts, I don't see it matters at all
<Ttech> CodeBlock-laptop, not really
<Ttech> wimt, so for staff?
<Ttech> they need ot be similar eg
<CodeBlock-laptop> so people know cb-laptop = codeblock laptop
<wimt> Well what's the one that's a concern?
<Ttech> ttech[ipaq] = ttech.devnode.staff
<Ttech> right?
<Ttech> wimt, CodeBlock-laptop's vhost
<charlie> you make a complete fuss over some quoteboat naming thing, you never hesitate to place large "HOSTED BY CODEBLOCK" messages on devnode websites, and you got mad when danopia called it "devnet"/"testnet", but you blow off issues that are actually important/what the network opers are discussing
<CodeBlock-laptop> wimt: ttech is making a big deal because i set my laptop as cb-laptop.devnode.staff
<wimt> CodeBlock-laptop, incidentally, I strongly suggest you don't ignore opers
<CodeBlock-laptop> charlie: if I'm that bad, maybe i should jsut disconnect and stay out.
<CodeBlock-laptop> ...
<wimt> I think it would be better saying CodeBlock in the vhost, fair point
<charlie> cb does not necessarily correspond to codeblock for users new to the network
<wimt> If you wanted cb-laptop.unaffiliated that would be fine
<CodeBlock-laptop> ...
<wimt> But makes sense to make it obvious if it's a staff one
<Ttech> wimt, agreed
<Ttech> Thats what I was figuring
<Ttech> Who agrees to that?
<wimt> That's what they do on freenode
<Ttech> wimt, yeah
<Ttech> it makes sense
<Ttech> CodeBlock-laptop, fair enough
<wimt> I just have wimt2 grouped to wimt - that's the easiest way
<Ttech> ?
<charlie> i agree, we should link nicks to current ones in order to preserve a uniform hostmask whenever we change nicks
<Ttech> mhm
<wimt> Well no hurry - may as well send out an email so everyone can comment. But it's fairly common sense.
<danopia`> keep us infomred
<CodeBlock-laptop> Ttech: you're a fucking immature bastard, you know that?
<Ttech> Who wants to write the email
<Ttech> 0.0
<CodeBlock-laptop> you really are
<CodeBlock-laptop> you're so immature
<CodeBlock-laptop> you cant fucking drop shit when i fucking tell you to.
<CodeBlock-laptop> now all this fucking happened
<CodeBlock-laptop> you're fucking immature
<charlie> CodeBlock-laptop: calm down codeblock
<CodeBlock-laptop> damn bastard
<Ttech> ok... But I asked the other opers
<CodeBlock-laptop> charlie: stfu
<CodeBlock-laptop> ><
<charlie> CodeBlock-laptop: we're just discussing network issues
<Ttech> Thats all
<charlie> CodeBlock-laptop: excuse me?
<Ttech> I should have asked there first
<CodeBlock-laptop> Ttech: you need to fucking drop god damn shit when i say to
<charlie> CodeBlock-laptop: again, calm down
<Ttech> CodeBlock-laptop, I should have asked the opers first
<Ttech> Before I assked you
<CodeBlock-laptop> i fcking said drop it and you couldnt
<wimt> CodeBlock-laptop, calm down please
<CodeBlock-laptop> you need to fuckingadsifhlaidufo b3tg[380qHF
<CodeBlock-laptop> EWOHFEOU FGFIUGEIPFGHFhEW H
<Ttech> ok
<CodeBlock-laptop> I"M NOT CALMING DOWN!
<wimt> CodeBlock-laptop, I suggest you try to grow up a little
<wimt> Preferably at least try acting your age rather than 10.
<Ttech> CodeBlock-laptop, I asked opers, its a democrasy
<CodeBlock-laptop> ...
<Ttech> Thats all I did
<CodeBlock-laptop> Ttech: you didnt need to ask anyone anything
<Ttech> I thought it was a network issue
<Ttech> And I asked
<CodeBlock-laptop> ...