Public feed #893729

Something

public text v1 · immutable
Raw Edit
·published 2008-02-06 12:00 UTC
rendered paste body
<span class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block; float: right;"><a href="http://www.wikipedia.org" target="_blank"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/6600GT_GPU.jpg/200px-6600GT_GPU.jpg" style="border: medium none ;" /></a><span style="margin: 1em 0pt 0pt; display: block;">Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></span></span><span><span><span>While workstation graphics cards are generally much more expensive than their gaming-class brethren, it's absolutely possible to build a budget-minded system with a workstation-class graphics card to match. Both NVIDIA and </span><a href="http://ati.amd.com/" title="ATI Technologies" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">ATI</a><span> have workstation-class cards that scale down below $500, a fraction of the price of most high-end workstation cards. This round-up looks at three affordable workstation cards, two new FireGL cards from AMD/</span><span>ATI</span><span> and a QuadroFX card from NVIDIA, and offers an evaluation of their relative performance in applications like Cinema 4D, 3D StudioMax, and SpecViewperf, as well as their respective price points.</span></span></span>