I suppose the leading theory on how we all got here, is that God created us. This is fine and all, but I have a problem accepting that. There's simply not enough proof. Then there's the Big Bang Theory, which is fina and all, and there's a bit more evidence to support it. All galaxies are moving away from each other, suggestion that they originated from a single point. It's just, I don't believe all the matter of the universe could have at one time been compressed to anywhere near the size of an egg. Even if it could have, there's still one problem, how did that egg sized compressed matter get there in the first place? This is also the problem with God, we are to believe he has always existed and doesn't have a begginning. Well, here's my theory.
We have an empty universe, absolutely nothing exists. Time however, does exist. Time isn't an object, so it does exist, but at this point can't be measured.
Now, according to Einstein and most other scientists, it isn't possible for matter to travel faster than light. As an object goes faster, it's mass increases, requiring more energy to accelerate it further. E=MC^. I don't know why they chose the speed of light for the cut off point, but w/e. I believe that it is possible for matter to go faster than the speed of light, but since it's most accepted, this theory doesn't require matter to go faster than the speed of light, only energy, which alot of scientists believe may be possible.
So, the speed of light is approx. 186,000 miles per sec, or 300,000 km per sec. Now let us assume there is a such thing as the speed of time, and let us also assume that it is sevel hundred times the speed of light. Let's say the speed of time is 200 times the speed of light, or 37,200,000 miles per sec (600,000,000 km per sec). The speed doesn't really matter, only that it does exist and may some how be achievable.
So, back to being empty space... It's completely empty, nothing is happening, then, all of a sudden, energy appears. From this energy that has just appeared, maybe the big bang begins, all that matters is that there is energy here to become matter and begin everything.
So where did the energy come from? It can't just come from no where? It comes from the future. In the future, energy some how reaches the speed of time, and goes even faster, traveling back in time. As it goes further and further backwards, it slows down, eventually slower than the speed of time again, and stops going backwards. According to the big bang theory, after it exploded, the energy traveled at super high speeds, creating matter. My theory works well with this.
The biggest problem with my theory, is how can the energy come from the future, when the future hasn't happened yet. It can't. But, energy in the future, can go back in time. So, how did that energy in the future first happen? Same way. No matter how far back you go, energy will always come from the future to the past. It's a bit of a paradox, but we don't know much about time. Time didn't have a beginning, it's not a physical object, it technically doesn't exist.
Also, for deja vu, let's assume it actually remembering an event when it hasn't happened yet. While it is more likely that it's just a malfunction in the brain, let's assume it isn't. Or even if it is, this is a theory about how it may be possible to see into the future.
We know that the brain operates on brain waves, when you sleep, there's plenty of em. Let's say that when you sleep, your brain may some how be able to pick up that energy traveling back through time, and that it can some how be used to see what was happening. It wouldn't really be seeing the future, but seeing the past, which was at one time the future. The future isn't written, it's just what happened. What happened before, may not work out the same way in the future. So seeing it and changing something won't tear a big hole in the universe. That's nonsense.
And while I'm at it, there's no proof for multible demensions. There is 2D, 3D, and so there must be more? Maybe, but there's no evidence to support that.
Anyways, there's quite a bit of flaws in my theory, and alot of assuming. But at this point, I nor anyone else can do much to proove it. Same as it can't be disprooven at this point. It can be argued that the accepted theories would have to work alot differently for my theory to happen, but that doesn't make it wrong. They are just theories, nothing has yet been prooven.
Let me know what you think, and I know I might not have done the best job at explaining, let me know what you don't understand and I'd be glad to explain better.