From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@jhammel.openplans.org>
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: jhammel@openplans.org
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:40:13 -0400 (EDT)
[-- Attachment #1: Notification --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.9K --]
This is the Postfix program at host jhammel.openplans.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The Postfix program
The Postfix program
<d.w.morriss@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[66.249.83.114] said:
550-5.7.1 [66.108.80.238] Our system has detected an unusual amount of
unsolicited 550-5.7.1 mail originating from your IP address. To protect our
550-5.7.1 users from spam, mail sent from your IP address has been
550-5.7.1 rejected. Please visit 550-5.7.1
http://www.google.com/mail/help/bulk_mail.html to review 550 5.7.1 our Bulk
Email Senders Guidelines. i16si1218481wxd (in reply to end of DATA command)
[-- Attachment #2: Delivery report --]
[-- Type: message/delivery-status, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.7K --]
Reporting-MTA: dns; jhammel.openplans.org
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 590956F8C
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; jhammel@openplans.org
Arrival-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; d.w.morriss@gmail.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[66.249.83.114]
said: 550-5.7.1 [66.108.80.238] Our system has detected an unusual amount
of unsolicited 550-5.7.1 mail originating from your IP address. To protect
our 550-5.7.1 users from spam, mail sent from your IP address has been
550-5.7.1 rejected. Please visit 550-5.7.1
http://www.google.com/mail/help/bulk_mail.html to review 550 5.7.1 our Bulk
Email Senders Guidelines. i16si1218481wxd (in reply to end of DATA command)
[-- Attachment #3: Undelivered Message --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 1.8K --]
From: Jeff Hammel <jhammel@openplans.org>
Subject: Re: little convergent evolution
To: whit <d.w.morriss@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:40:09 -0400
Very interesting, thanks for passing this along.
It seems he's sadly unaware of buildit, as there are many cosmetic parallels
there, and just judging from his code, there are nice things like automated
dependency checking, etc. But, given his comments about disliking .ini files,
maybe he wouldn't care for it anyway. I like the .ini file organization --
well, that's half true. I like that there is an abstraction layer. I dislike
.ini files, but that's probably just because I associate them with a certain
operating system that should not be named. And buildit does seem to have a few
undesirable characteristics regarding its .ini files -- nothing that can't be
fixed, just been meaning to talk to chrism about them.
It seems his Issue Collector is working (it seemed down, or at least 'weird')
for awhile, so I'll post this one there.
Jeff
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:37:54PM -0500, whit wrote:
> his task decorator looks a bit familiar ;)
> http://tinyurl.com/2vuvpl
>
> -w
>
> --
>
> ------ d. whit morriss ------
> - senior engineer, opencore -
> - http://www.openplans.org -
> - m: 415-710-8975 -
>
> "If you don't know where you are,
> you don't know anything at all"
>
> Dr. Edgar Spencer, Ph.D., 1995
>