rd1701: Since the Discovery has nothing to do with me, I would appreciate you removing me as GM also. I do not want to be slapped with an abuse of power if I were to do it myself
[1:22p] Buzz: alright, Emma
[1:23p] rd1701: thanks
[1:23p] Buzz: you're welcome
[1:24p] rd1701: Just out of curiousity.. who am I supposed to have been rude to over IM?
[1:24p] Buzz: there were multiple complainants
[1:24p] rd1701: funny.. since I haven't spoken to people over IM for months
[1:25p] Buzz: in fairness to them I will not name them
[1:25p] rd1701: in fairness to them.. you will also not provide any evidence of your accusations
[1:25p] rd1701: which is nice
[1:25p] Buzz: well, I named IM as a chat medium, but used it only to cover my description
[1:26p] rd1701: so basically, you lied
[1:26p] rd1701: nice
[1:26p] Buzz: no, it wasn't a lie, it was true
[1:27p] rd1701: how can it be true.. when I haven't had an IM conversation, baring the one with you discussing graduates?
[1:27p] rd1701: unless you're accusing me of being rude in that conversation
[1:28p] Buzz: I'd have to look at who said exactly what about here it happened
[1:28p] Buzz: no, you were not rude to me, and I appreciated that
[1:28p] rd1701: so therefore if I haven't had an IM conversation.. you've lied
[1:29p] Buzz: if that's the way you see it, nothing I can say will change that
[1:30p] rd1701: You will back up neither your claim of me being rude to a potential member, when I have done no such thing. Nor will you back up your claims about me being rude in other ways
[1:31p] Buzz: I am not going to name specific people and have them subject to being singled out
[1:31p] rd1701: I don't care about their names
[1:31p] Buzz: as for you being rude to a potential member, the log shows that initself
[1:32p] rd1701: so telling Brandon that he can find the URL in the channel topic
[1:32p] rd1701: and asking him if that meant he wasn't joining when he said he preferred Star Wars is being rude, is it?
[1:33p] Buzz: calling the newsletter a pack of lies in front of a potential member is damaging
[1:33p] rd1701: the newsletter was a pack of lies
[1:33p] Buzz: it was enough to cause a complaint
[1:34p] rd1701: so I'm not allowed to voice an opinion on a factually incorrect item
[1:34p] rd1701: nice line of censorship we have in this club
[1:34p] Buzz: then to say, "I guess you won't be joining then?" "Which is a smart thing."
[1:34p] Buzz: how can that be the right thing to say?
[1:34p] rd1701: LOL
[1:34p] rd1701: I was having a conversation with Melissa also
[1:34p] rd1701: she said she liked both Star Wars and Star Trek
[1:34p] rd1701: at the same time I asked Brandon the question
[1:35p] rd1701: my reply to her which is a smart move
[1:35p] Buzz: that may be, but it wasn't perceived that way
[1:35p] rd1701: so I'm being blamed for something.. I didn't do
[1:35p] rd1701: nice way you run things, Brian
[1:36p] Buzz: it's the complaint that is the basis for argument here, not how it was initiated
[1:37p] rd1701: it's a complaint that you decided to declare judgement on, without talking to me about it
[1:37p] rd1701: funny.. whenever I investigate a complaint I get both sides of the story
[1:37p] rd1701: something it was clear you were not interested in
[1:37p] Buzz: it's just a single part in the several factors that led to the decision
[1:37p] rd1701: right, if that's how you justify it to yourself, Brian