All pastes #348657 Raw Edit

Unnamed

public text v1 · immutable
·published 2007-02-10 08:39 UTC
rendered paste body
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:37:21] <Kyoshiro>  I'll try to see the logs
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:40:59] <Kyoshiro>  D, [2007/02/07 15:34:21#6962] DEBUG -- ircsocket.rb:343:in
 `gets': RECV: ":raoul`dort JOIN #test"
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:41:08] <Kyoshiro>  , [2007/02/07 15:34:21#6962] ERROR -- ircbot.rb:565:in `ma
inloop': non-net exception: NoMethodError: undefined method `downcase' for nil:NilClass
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:41:11] <Kyoshiro>  E, [2007/02/07 15:34:21#6962] ERROR -- ircbot.rb:566:in `m
ainloop': /home/services/mrou/rbot/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rbot/message.rb:291:in `initialize'
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:41:15] <Kyoshiro>  [...]
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:41:27] <Kyoshiro>  I, [2007/02/07 15:34:21#6962]  INFO -- ircbot.rb:581:in `m
ainloop': disconnected
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:41:45] <Kyoshiro>  I don't understand :/
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:47:05] <Kyoshiro>  I know
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:47:20] <Kyoshiro>  it's trying to use sourcenick.downcase
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:47:38] <Kyoshiro>  it seems not to have been able to compute sourcenick
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:49:14] <Kyoshiro>  shouldn't it be :raoul`dort!bip@bip.bip.bip JOIN #chan ?
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [09:58:24] <nohar>     I don't think rfc demands that
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:04:04] <Kyoshiro>  ok
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:04:10] <Kyoshiro>  but is it what you modified ?
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:04:44] <Kyoshiro>  I mean, was bip sending this format before the modificatio
ns ?
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:20:01] <nohar>     it was guessing the ircmask from server
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:20:10] <nohar>     and resending it to client
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:20:20] <nohar>     rbot stopped to work completly ?
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:59:39] <Kyoshiro>  yes
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [10:59:57] <Kyoshiro>  it disconnects/reconnects every 5 seconds
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [11:00:58] <Kyoshiro>  on freenode I have :Kyoshiro!n=kyoshiro@mibu.kyoshiro.org
JOIN :#tesrsgdhfdhr
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [11:01:14] <Kyoshiro>  maybe we should put a nick!bip@bip.bip.bip ?
[Wed Feb 7 2007] [11:18:20] <nohar>     again, I don't think rfc demands that :)