[14:36]<godson> hey did you speak to Balancer on adding to server config the ability to turn on and off the use of jbforth?
[14:36]<godson>
[14:36]<Juokelis> ah and got some answer
[14:36]<godson> oh
[14:36]<Juokelis> moment ... rebooted server and haven't read that ..
[14:37]<godson> heh k
[14:37]<Juokelis> had alot of problems after inta-web migration last late night :/
[14:38]<Juokelis> he's telling that he'se palnning move lot more stuff to forth ...
[14:38]<Juokelis> like all admincommands and soon ...
[14:38]<Juokelis> so on
[14:38]<Juokelis> i don't know ...
[14:38]<Juokelis> i hate forth ...
[14:38]<Juokelis> but i don't really wanna loose balancer ...
[14:39]<Juokelis> but .. if he's working only on forth ... let him go his way ..
[14:39]<Juokelis> split from team ... i don't see other way ...
[14:39]<godson> oh o.O
[14:39]<Juokelis> of course other way is manual ... but who'll write that :/
[14:39]<godson> he wants to even add more stuffs from forth to l2j? o.O
[14:39]<godson> man
[14:39]<godson> no one knows forth, i hate forth lol
[14:40]<godson> he should make it an option if he wants to add forth to l2j, so admins can turn the use of forth, on or off
[14:40]<godson> it shouldnt be added to implement that?
[14:41]<godson> of cause we dont want to loose Balancer, but if he wants to stay at l2j dev team, he needs to make the use of jbforth on the server, either on or off
[14:45] evomase%hotmail.com@msn.jabber.ru is now [14:45] evomase%hotmail.com@msn.jabber.ru is now godson (Busy)
[14:50]<Juokelis> as i undestand now we're in point where turning forth off will harm system overalll
[14:50]<Juokelis> that's won't be big harm for now but bigger and bigger in time
[14:51]<godson> o.O
[14:52]<godson> well it shouldnt
[14:52]<godson> when adding forth functions
[14:52]<godson> in the sources
[14:52]<godson> just add if(Config.allForth)
[14:52]<godson> than continue
[14:52]<godson> then*
[14:52]<godson> thats shouldnt be hard to do
[14:52]<godson> ...
[14:53]<Juokelis> ok i undestand that .. but in that case anyone coding in forth
[14:53]<Juokelis> will need code tvice - forth + java
[14:53]<godson> yes
[14:53]<Juokelis> balancer won't do that for shure
[14:53]<Juokelis> why do same stuff twice ?
[14:53]<godson> i dont want forth
[14:53]<Juokelis> it easier to him make it in forth ..
[14:54]<godson> well i dont like forth
[14:54]<Juokelis> just problem is that from scripting it rose to coding :/
[14:54]<Juokelis> i hate forth
[14:54]<godson> no one in the dev team likes it
[14:54]<godson> only Balancer
[14:54]<Juokelis> yes
[14:54]<Juokelis> as long it was jsut additional script which we can live without
[14:54]<Juokelis> that was ok
[14:54]<godson> so well when Age comes back everyone will tell Age to ask Balancer to either remove it! or make it an option
[14:54]<Juokelis> but now ...
[14:55]<Juokelis> i do support you on that really
[14:55]<Juokelis> leave forth jsut for some additional stuff, custom, events, quests .. so on ..
[14:55]<godson> because atm we are soo angry with all the forth bugs/ errors we have, and maybe exploit, and its quite pointless if only one person knows it! the other dev when asked questions about the forth bugs willl look like a fool, because we dont know it
[14:55]<godson> yes
[14:56]<godson> now, his added it to everything
[14:56]<godson> thats really bad
[14:56]<godson> because everyone is kinda angry with all this forth stuff, and am sure when Age comes back he will tell Balancer to either make it an option (turn off or on)
[14:56]<godson> or
[14:56]<godson> remove it all
[14:58]<godson> so if he wants to still leave forth in l2j, he better start making it an option before Age comes back