Part of Slepp's ProjectsPastebinTURLImagebinFilebin
Feedback -- English French German Japanese
Create Upload Newest Tools Donate
Sign In | Create Account

Miscellany
Sunday, September 30th, 2007 at 8:43:34am UTC 

  1. > As far as moving the tree to be dm320/mr-500, I don't particularly care, but
  2. > personally I think it's easier to keep the targets completely independent
  3. > till they reach a mature state (which I think very few of our targets are
  4. > in) and then maybe the code can be re-factored to reduce some of the
  5. > duplicate stuff between similar targets.  Right now we're the only DM320
  6. > target, so I don't think it's critical to do right now and just dealing with
  7. > all the cruft between the different arm targets annoys me.  crt0 is a good
  8. > example as well as system-target...  I just think it would be easier if the
  9. > low level stuff was completely independent for now - it also reduces the
  10. > risk of breaking other targets while we're developing.
  11. >

Update the Post

Either update this post and resubmit it with changes, or make a new post.

You may also comment on this post.

update paste below
details of the post (optional)

Note: Only the paste content is required, though the following information can be useful to others.

Save name / title?

(space separated, optional)



Please note that information posted here will expire by default in one month. If you do not want it to expire, please set the expiry time above. If it is set to expire, web search engines will not be allowed to index it prior to it expiring. Items that are not marked to expire will be indexable by search engines. Be careful with your passwords. All illegal activities will be reported and any information will be handed over to the authorities, so be good.

comments powered by Disqus
worth-right
worth-right
worth-right